A theatre tour in India
In January and February 2009 I created a performance with young actors and musicians from different areas of the Northeast. Puppetshow ‘Bijulli’ is the last part of a 3 phase project of Theatre Embassy, the Netherlands, in which the actors combined their own cultural and theatre knowledge with the puppetry-skills that they learned in the workshop in August.
This project brings different communities together. We face life from various angles.
Nine languages are spoken by actors and team ( Rabha, Boro, Assamese, Manipuri, Hindi, English, Tiwa, Missing, Dutch). The communication was sometimes complicated as translation takes time and is not always clear. But it was a challenge to express the inner view of this colorful group.
Bijuli is a performance based on improvisation, experience and fantasy of the actors. The show reflects on the world around us by movement and puppetry. Newspapers bring the outside world in our homes. How can we react on terror and pain? How to keep trust in life? Is it possible to create if we feel powerless?
We seduce the audience to follow us to the dreamlike area behind the reality of newspaper-articles, where we find smiles and tears, powerful city-peoples, worries of villagers, politicians and the last Assemese rhino.
Bijuli is performed in 16 various theatres in Assam and Karnataka, India.
Review from Akshara
I liked Bijuli for several reasons. I will mention only two, which I felt are most significant:
1. For its simple and powerful theatricality. In India, this is a time when theatre directors, especially in urban centres are becoming techno-savy. For example, my friend from Delhi used to tell me that these days, to become a ‘contemporary play’ in Delhi any production has to have a video projection at least! And I am also told that Institutions such as NSD spend several lakhs of rupees on a production. In such a context, a production which was rich in imagination but poor in terms of its expenditure was a welcome sight. The fact that your production, mounted with minimum physical resources, was powerful enough to hold the audience here spell bound for an hour (even when the audience did NOT understand any spoken word in it) is a proof for its immense theatrical strength.
2. For the fact that the play was produced in the northe-east where even a normal daily life has become difficult these days. Watching the involvement of the actors, and their effort in the work, I am sure that it has been both a confidance booster as well as a means of social communication for that community. The actors were not only capable, but they were also committed to a serious communication — which made watching the play a really moving experience for me.
I only wish that you will continue your association with them and produce more such theatrical experiences with them…
K.V. Akshara
Heggodu, Karnataka, India
